Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The submissive chameleon: Third-party inferences from observing mimicry

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past research has shown that mimicry has a number of pro-social consequences for interaction partners. However, such research has almost exclusively focused on its effects among interaction dyads. As social interactions are often witnessed by third-party observers, the question arises which inferences perceivers draw from observing mimicry. In the present work, we apply a third-party perspective to mimicry and test whether observers perceive mimicking individuals as submissive. Experiment 1 confirmed our prediction and found that observers perceived a mimicking person as less dominant, and thus more submissive, than a mimicked person. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and ruled out possible demand effects. Experiment 3 showed that when an interaction partner does not mimic the movements initiated by another person, the interaction partner gains dominance in the eye of the observer. Experiment 4 demonstrates that the inferences that perceivers draw from observing mimicry partly rely on a mere action-response pattern. These findings have not only important implications for mimicry as a genuinely social phenomenon, but also for research on impression management and person perception.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103966
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume88
ISSN0022-1031
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05.2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.

Research areas and keywords

  • Dominance
  • Imitation
  • Mimicry
  • Person perception
  • Submissiveness
  • Business psychology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The submissive chameleon: Third-party inferences from observing mimicry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this