The relationship between working alliance and client outcomes in coaching: A meta-analysis

  • Carolin Graßmann*
  • , Franziska Schölmerich
  • , Carsten C. Schermuly
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

152 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing number of studies emphasize the working alliance between the client and the coach to be a key factor in coaching. Synthesizing 27 samples (N = 3563 coaching processes), this meta-analysis sheds light on the relationship between working alliance and a broad range of coaching outcomes for clients. The meta-analytic results indicate a moderate and consistent overall relationship between a high-quality working alliance and coaching outcomes for clients (r =.41, 95% CI [.34,.48], p <.001). Working alliance was positively related to all desirable coaching outcomes (range: r =.32 to.64), with the strongest relationship to affective and cognitive coaching outcomes. Moreover, working alliance was negatively related to unintended negative effects of coaching (r = –.29). Results revealed no differences regarding the type of clients, coaches’ expertise, number of coaching sessions, and clients’ or coaches’ perspectives. Similar to other helping relationships like psychotherapy or mentoring, the results support the importance of a high-quality working alliance in coaching.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Relations
Volume73
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)35-58
Number of pages24
ISSN0018-7267
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2020

Research areas and keywords

  • client outcomes
  • coaching
  • meta-analysis
  • relationship quality
  • working alliance
  • Management studies

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between working alliance and client outcomes in coaching: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this