The power of putting a label on it: Green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers' purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior

  • Ulf J.J. Hahnel*
  • , Oliver Arnold
  • , Michael Waschto
  • , Liridon Korcaj
  • , Karen Hillmann
  • , Damaris Roser
  • , Hans Spada
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Green products are appealing. Thus, labeling products as environmentally friendly is an effective strategy to increase sales. However, the labels often promise more than the products can actually deliver. In the present research, we examined the expectation that consumers with high ecological motivation have strong preferences for green-labeled products - even when presented product information contradicts the label's image. This unsettling hypothesis is grounded in the labels' potential to create a cognitive match between the labeled product and consumers' motives. For labels indicating environmental friendliness (green product labels), this link should be strongest when consumers' ecological motivation is high. Findings in a series of three experiments support our assumption, showing that consumers with high ecological motivation had strong preferences (i.e., product evaluations, purchase intentions, and simulated purchase decisions) for green-labeled products as compared to consumers with low ecological motivation (Studies 1-3). Crucially, these preferences were robust, despite contradicting environmental product information (Studies 1 and 2). We extended our findings by additionally examining the impact of product labels and motivation on moral self-regulation processes. This was established by assessing participants' pro-social behavior after the purchase task: participants with high ecological motivation acted, consistent with their motives, more pro-socially in post-decision occasions. In accordance with moral cleansing effects, pro-social behavior was intensified after purchasing conventional products (Studies 2 and 3). Green labels protected participants with high ecological motivation from moral threats due to the purchase, thus making pro-social behavior less likely. Findings suggest that highly ecologically motivated consumers are most susceptible to green labels, which may override detailed product information.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1392
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume6
Number of pages17
ISSN1664-1078
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23.09.2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Hahnel, Arnold, Waschto, Korcaj, Hillmann, Roser and Spada.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Research areas and keywords

  • Behavioral consistency
  • Conservation (ecological behavior)
  • Ecological motives
  • Moral self-regulation
  • Perceived matching
  • Product labeling
  • Self-congruity
  • Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The power of putting a label on it: Green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers' purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this