The Interplay Between Supply Chain Transparency and NGO Pressure: A Quantitative Analysis in the Fashion Industry Context

  • Naemi Schäfer*
  • , Lars Petersen
  • , Jacob Hörisch
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Companies have been experiencing increasing pressure from NGOs to overcome unethical and unsustainable behaviours. The purpose of this research was to study the interplay between supply chain transparency and NGO pressure. The analysis builds on the literature on supply chain transparency and institutional pressures. We conducted a time-lagged, multi-level regression analysis that included data from 270 fashion companies over a 5-year period to investigate the effect of NGO pressure on transparency and vice versa. The results revealed that companies with higher levels of transparency are more likely to be pressured by NGOs than less transparent companies. Furthermore, our findings show that, depending on the number of campaigns, NGO power and communication about campaigns, NGO pressure can either stimulate corporate transparency or turn into a negative effect that leads to lower levels of transparency.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume192
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)713-727
Number of pages15
ISSN0167-4544
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 07.2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.

Research areas and keywords

  • Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
  • NGO pressure
  • Quantitative analysis
  • Supply chain transparency
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Business and International Management
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Interplay Between Supply Chain Transparency and NGO Pressure: A Quantitative Analysis in the Fashion Industry Context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this