Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work

  • Jochen Prümper*
  • , Dieter Zapf
  • , Felix C. Brodbeck
  • , Michael Frese
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of different levels of expertise on errors in human-computer interaction. In a field study 174 clerical workers from 12 different companies were observed during their normal office work and were questioned on their expertise with computers. The level of expertise was determined by (a) the length of time an employee had worked with a computer (computer expertise); (b) the number of programs she knew (program expertise); and (c) the daily time s/he spent working with the computer (daily work-time expertise). These different operationalizations of novices and experts led to different results. In contrast to widespread assumptions, experts did not make fewer errors than novices (except in knowledge errors). On the other hand, experts spent less time handling the errors than novices. A cluster analysis produced four groups in the workforce: occasional users, frequent users, beginners, and general users. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBehaviour and Information Technology
Volume11
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)319-328
Number of pages10
ISSN0144-929X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.11.1992
Externally publishedYes

Research areas and keywords

  • Business psychology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this