Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23

    Research output: Journal contributionsNotes on court decisionsResearch

    Abstract

    This case note addresses a preliminary injunction issued by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, “BVerfG”) on 5 July 2023, which ordered the German Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) to abstain from the second and third readings of a draft law during the then-current week of the parliamentary session. Unprecedented, the Court found that the significantly compressed timeframe of the legislative proceedings may violate the parliamentarians’ constitutional right to deliberation.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalTransatlantic Law Journal
    Volume1
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)77-80
    Number of pages4
    ISSN2941-3052
    Publication statusPublished - 20.09.2023

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Research areas and keywords

    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this