Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23

Till Patrik Holterhus

Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23

Till Patrik Holterhus^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Professorship of Constitutional and Administrative Law, International Public Law and Comparative Law

Research output: Journal contributions › Notes on court decisions › Research

Abstract

This case note addresses a preliminary injunction issued by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, “BVerfG”) on 5 July 2023, which ordered the German Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) to abstain from the second and third readings of a draft law during the then-current week of the parliamentary session. Unprecedented, the Court found that the significantly compressed timeframe of the legislative proceedings may violate the parliamentarians’ constitutional right to deliberation.

Original language	English
Journal	Transatlantic Law Journal
Volume	1
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	77-80
Number of pages	4
ISSN	2941-3052
Publication status	Published - 20.09.2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Research areas and keywords

Law

Access to Document

https://beck-online.beck.de/Bcid/Y-300-Z-TLJ-B-2023-S-77-N-1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Holterhus, T. P. (2023). Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23. Transatlantic Law Journal, 1(2), 77-80. https://beck-online.beck.de/Bcid/Y-300-Z-TLJ-B-2023-S-77-N-1

@article{23393a21f3844d6cbe6c707044991813,

title = "Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians{\textquoteright} Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23",

abstract = "This case note addresses a preliminary injunction issued by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, “BVerfG”) on 5 July 2023, which ordered the German Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) to abstain from the second and third readings of a draft law during the then-current week of the parliamentary session. Unprecedented, the Court found that the significantly compressed timeframe of the legislative proceedings may violate the parliamentarians{\textquoteright} constitutional right to deliberation.",

keywords = "Law, Deliberation, Heilmann, Bundesverfassungsgericht",

author = "Holterhus, \{Till Patrik\}",

year = "2023",

month = sep,

day = "20",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

pages = "77--80",

journal = "Transatlantic Law Journal",

issn = "2941-3052",

publisher = "C.H. Beck Verlag",

number = "2",

}

Holterhus, TP 2023, 'Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23', Transatlantic Law Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77-80. <https://beck-online.beck.de/Bcid/Y-300-Z-TLJ-B-2023-S-77-N-1>

Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation: Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23. / Holterhus, Till Patrik.
In: Transatlantic Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 20.09.2023, p. 77-80.

Research output: Journal contributions › Notes on court decisions › Research

TY - JOUR

T1 - Significantly Compressed Timeframe of Legislative Proceedings May Violate Parliamentarians’ Right to Deliberation

T2 - Case Note on Heilman v. Deutscher Bundestag (Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG) [German Federal Constitutional Court] 5 July 2023 - 2 BvE 4/23

AU - Holterhus, Till Patrik

PY - 2023/9/20

Y1 - 2023/9/20

N2 - This case note addresses a preliminary injunction issued by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, “BVerfG”) on 5 July 2023, which ordered the German Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) to abstain from the second and third readings of a draft law during the then-current week of the parliamentary session. Unprecedented, the Court found that the significantly compressed timeframe of the legislative proceedings may violate the parliamentarians’ constitutional right to deliberation.

AB - This case note addresses a preliminary injunction issued by the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, “BVerfG”) on 5 July 2023, which ordered the German Parliament (Deutscher Bundestag) to abstain from the second and third readings of a draft law during the then-current week of the parliamentary session. Unprecedented, the Court found that the significantly compressed timeframe of the legislative proceedings may violate the parliamentarians’ constitutional right to deliberation.

KW - Law

KW - Deliberation

KW - Heilmann

KW - Bundesverfassungsgericht

M3 - Notes on court decisions

SN - 2941-3052

VL - 1

SP - 77

EP - 80

JO - Transatlantic Law Journal

JF - Transatlantic Law Journal

IS - 2

ER -