Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Self-Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth-Király, and Colosimo (2018)

  • Mattis Geiger
  • , Stefan Pfattheicher*
  • , Johanna Hartung
  • , Selina Weiss
  • , Simon Schindler
  • , Oliver Wilhelm
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we respond to comments by Neff et al. (2018) made about our finding that the negative dimensions of self-compassion were redundant with facets of neuroticism (rs ≥ 0.85; Pfattheicher et al., 2017) and not incrementally valid. We first provide epistemological guidance for establishing psychological constructs, namely, three hurdles that new constructs must pass: theoretically and empirically sound measurement, discriminant validity, and incremental validity—and then apply these guidelines to the self-compassion scale. We then outline that the critique of Neff et al. (2018) is contestable. We question their decisions concerning data-analytic methods that help them to circumvent instead of passing the outlined hurdles. In a reanalysis of the data provided by Neff et al. (2018), we point to several conceptual and psychometric problems and conclude that self-compassion does not overcome the outlined hurdles. Instead, we show that our initial critique of the self-compassion scale holds and that its dimensions are best considered facets of neuroticism.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume32
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)393-404
Number of pages12
ISSN0890-2070
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2018
Externally publishedYes

Research areas and keywords

  • jangle fallacy
  • neuroticism
  • rebuttal
  • self-compassion
  • Psychology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Compassion as a Facet of Neuroticism? A Reply to the Comments of Neff, Tóth-Király, and Colosimo (2018)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this