Abstract
In Germany, many labour laws and regulations apply only in establishments above a critical size, and usually these thresholds are defined by the number of employees. The existing 160 thresholds are complex and defined inconsistently, making it difficult for firms to obey the law. Moreover, exceeding a threshold may result in costs for the firm such as establishing a works council or paying a penalty for not employing disabled persons. Although the empirical evidence is mixed, some studies suggest that employment growth is dampened by firms trying not to exceed thresholds. In order to minimize these transaction costs and side effects, we make several suggestions to simplify and unify the threshold regulations. © 2007 die Autoren Journal compilation © 2007, Verein für Socialpolitik und Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
| Translated title of the contribution | Thresholds in the labor law: Increased transparency and efficiency through standardization |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Journal | Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 242-255 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISSN | 1465-6493 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.08.2007 |
Bibliographical note
Dieser Beitrag entstand im Rahmen des DFG-Projektes SCHN 730/3–2 bzw. WA 610/4–2 im Schwerpunktprogramm „Flexibilisierungspotenziale bei heterogenen Arbeitsmärkten”. Wir danken der DFG für die finanzielle Förderung sowie Marc Zedler und einem anonymen Gutachter für sehr hilfreiche Kommentare.Research areas and keywords
- Economics
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Thresholds in the labor law: Increased transparency and efficiency through standardization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver