Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies?

  • Akshat Sudheshwar
  • , Christina Apel
  • , Klaus Kümmerer
  • , Lya G Soeteman-Hernández
  • , Johanna K Scheper
  • , Andreas Falk
  • , Annika Batel
  • , Jochen Markard
  • , Claudia Som
  • , Zhanyun Wang
  • , Bernd Nowack

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The European Green Deal, popular for its “2050 climate neutrality” target, also postulates the “zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment,” supported through the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS). The CSS mentions Safe and Sustainable-by-Design (SSbD), calling for the integration of safety and sustainability into innovation. Developing the SSbD framework further is a key action enabling both CSS objectives and the broader Green Deal ambitions. Yet, SSbD’s complexity and data demands are seen by many companies as burdensome, and the benefits of SSbD adoption remain unclear. Therefore, this study examines SSbD’s role in “regulatory readiness,” i.e., proactive development of novel chemicals, materials, and products for compliance before market entry and for adaptability to future regulations. By analyzing 15 EU policies (prioritized through industry feedback) against 15 SSbD components, this study finds a 64% overlap, i.e., many mandates for SSbD components are observed within the analyzed legislation. The findings of this study inform recommendations for industry and policymakers to foster industrial competitiveness in the European Union. Companies are recommended to leverage SSbD for early regulatory readiness, internalize SSbD’s “fail early and fail cheap” philosophy, and invest in SSbD capacity building. Policymakers are recommended to incentivize corporate SSbD adoption, explicitly integrate SSbD into future legislation, and invest in research to address critical gaps in safety and sustainability sciences to strengthen SSbD further.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Volume22
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)891-909
Number of pages19
ISSN1551-3777
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 05.2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Research areas and keywords

  • Chemistry
  • eu green deal
  • clean industrial deal
  • safe and sustainable-by-design (SSbD)
  • regulatory
  • readliness
  • regulatory pressure

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Science(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safe and Sustainable-by-Design under The European Green Deal - Regulatory Readiness or Pressure for Companies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this