Abstract
Many organizational researchers have argued that proactivity and adaptability are important for performing effectively in the workplace (e.g., Griffi n, Neal, and Parker, 2007). However, there is no consensus on the meanings of these two terms and how they relate to each other. Some researchers assume that proactivity and adaptability are opposites constructs, for example by viewing proactive behavior in explicit contrast to reactive behavior and construing adaptive behavior as the latter (e.g., Frese and Fay, 2001). Other researchers, on the other hand, see proactivity and adaptability as being independent constructs (cf. Griffi n et al., 2007) or as positively interrelated constructs (e.g., Berg, Wrzesniewski, and Dutton, 2010).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Individual adaptability to changes at work : New directions in research |
| Editors | D. Chan |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Place of Publication | New York |
| Publisher | Routledge Taylor & Francis Group |
| Publication date | 20.05.2014 |
| Pages | 36-51 |
| ISBN (Print) | 0-415-83290-X, 978-0-415-83290-8, 978-0-415-83291-5 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-0-203-46572-1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20.05.2014 |
Research areas and keywords
- Business psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Proactivity and Adaptability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver