Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

  • Linda Bolier
  • , Merel Haverman
  • , Gerben J. Westerhof
  • , Heleen Riper
  • , Filip Smit
  • , Ernst Bohlmeijer

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

    1530 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background
    The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problems.

    Methods
    We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, the Cochrane register, and manual searches. Forty articles, describing 39 studies, totaling 6,139 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome measures used were subjective well-being, psychological well-being and depression. Positive psychology interventions included self-help interventions, group training and individual therapy.

    Results
    The standardized mean difference was 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being and 0.23 for depression indicating small effects for positive psychology interventions. At follow-up from three to six months, effect sizes are small, but still significant for subjective well-being and psychological well-being, indicating that effects are fairly sustainable. Heterogeneity was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the studies included. Several variables moderated the impact on depression: Interventions were more effective if they were of longer duration, if recruitment was conducted via referral or hospital, if interventions were delivered to people with certain psychosocial problems and on an individual basis, and if the study design was of low quality. Moreover, indications for publication bias were found, and the quality of the studies varied considerably.

    Conclusions
    The results of this meta-analysis show that positive psychology interventions can be effective in the enhancement of subjective well-being and psychological well-being, as well as in helping to reduce depressive symptoms. Additional high-quality peer-reviewed studies in diverse (clinical) populations are needed to strengthen the evidence-base for positive psychology interventions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number119
    JournalBMC Public Health
    Volume13
    Issue number1
    Number of pages20
    ISSN1471-2458
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 08.02.2013

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Research areas and keywords

    • Psychology
    • Depression
    • Effectiveness
    • Interventions
    • Meta-analysis
    • Positive psychology
    • Randomized controlled trials
    • Well-being

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this