Abstract
This article is based on the thesis that wilderness as a cultural value emerges where it has been lost as a geographical and material phenomenon. In Europe the idea of wilderness experienced a surprising upswing at the end of the twentieth and beginning of the twenty-first century, with wilderness tours, wilderness education, and self-experience trips into "wilderness" becoming widely established. Also, protection of "wilderness areas" which refers to such different phenomena as large forests, wild gardens, and urban wild is very much in demand. Against this background, the article looks into the material-ecological and symbolic-cultural senses of "wilderness" in the context of changing social relations to nature. Three forms of wilderness are distinguished. Adopting a socio-ecological perspective, the article builds on contemporary risk discourse.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Nature and Culture |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 293-315 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| ISSN | 1558-6073 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.2009 |
Bibliographical note
Literaturverz. S. 313 - 315Research areas and keywords
- Environmental planning
- Nature conservation
- Nature-society relations
- Reproductivity
- Social ecology
- Sustainable development
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Social Sciences(all)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Natures running wild: a social-ecological perspective on wilderness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
Wildnis und nachhaltige Entwicklung
Hofmeister, S. (Project manager, academic)
01.01.07 → …
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver