Mourning Practices on the Internet

  • Christa Dürscheid*
  • , Karina Frick
  • , Christina Margrit Siever
  • , Sandro Wick
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The article presents the results of our URPP subproject "Mourning Practices on the Internet", in which four linguists collaborated. Following our disciplinary background, the aim of the project was to explore how feelings of grief after a tragic event are expressed on the internet, what linguistic and visual means of expression are used, and how this form of online mourning is reported in the media (i.e. in newspapers). A particular focus was placed on the question of religious references found in the data we examined. Such references are expected in the context of death and mourning; the project investigated how these references are explicitly established. While other studies are predominantly in English, our research centers on German-language data. The article presents selected results from our qualitative and quantitative analyses and highlights how closely offline and online mourning practices are intertwined in our digitally permeated world.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReligious Communication, Interaction and Transformation in a Culture of Digitality : Insights into the Zurich University Research Priority Program "Digital Religion(s)?
EditorsThomas Schlag, Katharina Yadav
Number of pages20
PublisherWalter de Gruyter
Publication date14.12.2025
Pages7-26
ISBN (Print)9783111721125
ISBN (Electronic)9783111721729
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14.12.2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter.

Research areas and keywords

  • Literature studies
  • Language Studies

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Arts and Humanities
  • General Social Sciences
  • General Computer Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mourning Practices on the Internet'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this