Abstract
Ipsative personality questionnaires can reduce the effects of social desirability. However, the answering‐format induces artificial dependencies, which raises questions about its normative interpretability. In a field study 145 German speaking expatriates were assessed with the ipsative OPQ32i (SHL, 1999) and the normative NEO‐PI‐R (Ostendorf & Angleitner, 2004) in seven countries. A significant set correlation shows that the OPQ32i captures normative variances (R2shrunk= 0.99). According to a multi‐trait‐multi‐method matrix relationships between scales and factors of both instruments are interpretable conceptually. Therefore, ipsative questionnaires seem to be applicable for inter‐individual comparisons if some specific conditions are met.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Psychology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 283-283 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| ISSN | 0020-7594 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.06.2008 |
Bibliographical note
Document Type: Meeting AbstractResearch areas and keywords
- Business psychology
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Psychology(all)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Minimization of answer distortion in personality questionnaires: Does the ipsative OPQ32i capture normative variances?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver