Abstract
The purpose of this systematic literature review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the methods used to measure board diversity. We develop a framework to structure empirical studies and develop an agenda for future research. We selected 61 empirical articles from an initial sample of 1035. This study discusses the different data collection methods. We group director and board attributes into the constructs of structural, demographic, and cognitive diversity. We identify four different approaches to combining and measuring diversity: non-index, single-index, cross-indices, and inter-indices. We find that measuring board diversity requires a mixture of archival and primary research, as well as various methods such as applying indices, constructing heterogeneity scores, and using machine learning approaches to infer directors' attributes. We contribute to research by providing a framework that structures measuring techniques for board diversity, a future research agenda, and insights on potential window-dressing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 977-992 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISSN | 1535-3958 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 03.2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Authors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management published by ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Research areas and keywords
- board attributes
- board diversity
- cognitive characteristics
- measurement
- structural characteristics
- systematic literature review
- Management studies
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Strategy and Management
- Development
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring board diversity: A systematic literature review of data sources, constructs, pitfalls, and suggestions for future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver