Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The far right is becoming increasingly established worldwide and is now in its ‘fourth wave’, characterised by its mainstreaming and normalisation. Although more and more political science research focuses on these processes, we argue that this literature lacks conceptual clarity about what these terms mean, which actors are involved, and what effects these processes have. This article has two aims. First, we describe how mainstreaming and normalisation have been conceptualised and analysed in the existing literature. Building on this, we then introduce a conceptual framework for future empirical research and discuss three research avenues: more precise operationalisations of the mainstream/normal and non-mainstream/abnormal, more refined theories about different political actors, and a broader analytical perspective beyond immigration issues and national-level dynamics.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
Number of pages17
ISSN0304-4130
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02.03.2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Research areas and keywords

  • Politics
  • far right
  • mainstreaming
  • normalisation
  • mainstream parties

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this