Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Learning to plan self-controlled physical education: Good vs. problematic teaching examples

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Educational research assumes reflection on teaching examples to have positive effects on pre-service teachers' professional development. The role of teaching quality in such examples is unclear, however. In a field experiment with a pre-post-design, we taught “planning self-controlled learning” to 83 undergraduate pre-service physical education teachers and assigned them to three conditions: they either reflected on good teaching or problematic teaching examples or they compared both types of examples. We found that the comparison of examples supported their instruction planning more than reflecting good or problematic teaching examples only. In addition, comparing examples changed the pre-service teachers' beliefs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTeaching and Teacher Education
Volume71
Pages (from-to)168-178
Number of pages11
ISSN0742-051X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04.2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Research areas and keywords

  • Case-based learning
  • Examples
  • Physical education
  • Self-controlled learning
  • Teacher education
  • Educational science
  • Psychology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning to plan self-controlled physical education: Good vs. problematic teaching examples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this