Abstract
Educational research assumes reflection on teaching examples to have positive effects on pre-service teachers' professional development. The role of teaching quality in such examples is unclear, however. In a field experiment with a pre-post-design, we taught “planning self-controlled learning” to 83 undergraduate pre-service physical education teachers and assigned them to three conditions: they either reflected on good teaching or problematic teaching examples or they compared both types of examples. We found that the comparison of examples supported their instruction planning more than reflecting good or problematic teaching examples only. In addition, comparing examples changed the pre-service teachers' beliefs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Teaching and Teacher Education |
| Volume | 71 |
| Pages (from-to) | 168-178 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 0742-051X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 04.2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Research areas and keywords
- Case-based learning
- Examples
- Physical education
- Self-controlled learning
- Teacher education
- Educational science
- Psychology
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Learning to plan self-controlled physical education: Good vs. problematic teaching examples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver