Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Inside-sediment partitioning of PAH, PCB and organochlorine compounds and inferences on sampling and normalization methods

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Comparability of sediment analyses for semivolatile organic substances is still low. Neither screening of the sediments nor organic-carbon based normalization is sufficient to obtain comparable results. We are showing the interdependency of grain-size effects with inside-sediment organic-matter distribution for PAH, PCB and organochlorine compounds. Surface sediment samples collected by Van-Veen grab were sieved and analyzed for 16 PAH, 6 PCB and 18 organochlorine pesticides (OCP) as well as organic-matter content. Since bulk concentrations are influenced by grain-size effects themselves, we used a novel normalization method based on the sum of concentrations in the separate grain-size fractions of the sediments. By calculating relative normalized concentrations, it was possible to clearly show underlying mechanisms throughout a heterogeneous set of samples. Furthermore, we were able to show that, for comparability, screening at <125 μm is best suited and can be further improved by additional organic-carbon normalization.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEnvironmental Pollution
    Volume159
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)924-931
    Number of pages8
    ISSN0269-7491
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 04.2011

    Bibliographical note

    Issue 4, April 2011

    Research areas and keywords

    • Chemistry
    • Grain-size partitioning
    • Normalization
    • Organic carbon
    • Organic pollutants
    • Sediment

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
    • Toxicology
    • Pollution

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inside-sediment partitioning of PAH, PCB and organochlorine compounds and inferences on sampling and normalization methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this