Abstract
This research note addresses the question of how permanent workers perceive their individual job security if their firm employs temporary workers with fixed-term contracts and temporary agency workers. One the one hand, the core-periphery hypothesis predicts that permanent workers should have fewer concerns about job security if the firm employs temporary workers to deal with demand fluctuations. On the other hand, a counteracting substitution effect might increase concerns about job security. Using linked employer-employee data and estimating regression models at the worker level with establishment fixed effects, evidence supports the core-periphery hypothesis for temporary agency work but not for fixed-term contracts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 205 |
| Journal | Economies |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.08.2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 by the authors.
Research areas and keywords
- core-periphery hypothesis
- fixed-term contracts
- job security
- linked employer-employee data
- temporary agency work
- Economics
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
- Development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Firms’ Use of Temporary Employment and Permanent Workers’ Concerns about Job Security: Evidence from German Linked Employer-Employee Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver