Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exact and approximate inference for annotating graphs with structural SVMs

  • Thoralf Klein*
  • , Ulf Brefeld
  • , Tobias Scheffer
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksArticle in conference proceedingsResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Training processes of structured prediction models such as structural SVMs involve frequent computations of the maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) prediction given a parameterized model. For specific output structures such as sequences or trees, MAP estimates can be computed efficiently by dynamic programming algorithms such as the Viterbi algorithm and the CKY parser. However, when the output structures can be arbitrary graphs, exact calculation of the MAP estimate is an NP-complete problem. In this paper, we compare exact inference and approximate inference for labeling graphs. We study the exact junction tree and the approximate loopy belief propagation and sampling algorithms in terms of performance and ressource requirements.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMachine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases : ECML PKDD 2008
EditorsWalter Daelemans, Bart Goethals, Katharina Morik
Number of pages13
Place of PublicationBerlin, Heidelberg
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Publication date2008
Pages611-623
ISBN (Print)978-3-540-87478-2
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-540-87479-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes
EventEuropean Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases - 2008 - Antwerpen, Belgium
Duration: 15.09.200819.09.2008
http://www.ecmlpkdd2008.org/

Research areas and keywords

  • Informatics
  • Gibbs Sampling
  • Graph Size
  • Junction Tree
  • Approximate Inference
  • Exact Inference
  • Business informatics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exact and approximate inference for annotating graphs with structural SVMs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this