Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence

  • Volker Rybowiak
  • , Harry Garst
  • , Michael Frese*
  • , Bernad Batinic
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

274 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) was developed, consisting of eight scales on attitudes to and on coping with errors at work. In Study I (representative sample of a German city, N = 478) six scales were developed with the help of a confirmatory factor analysis using LISREL techniques. They comprise error competence, learning from errors, error risk taking, error strain, error anticipation, covering up errors. All constructs were validated. In a second study, items were added to the scales and two additional scales, 'error communication' and 'thinking about errors', were included. The scales were translated into English and Dutch and 160 students in the Netherlands filled out both language versions (Study II). The 8-factor solutions in English and Dutch were replicated. The issue of language equivalence of these two language versions were taken up (equivalence across correlations exists). Potentially biasing variables did not influence the solutions. Practical uses of the EOQ are pointed out.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume20
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)527-547
Number of pages21
ISSN0894-3796
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 07.1999
Externally publishedYes

Research areas and keywords

  • Business psychology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this