Abstract
This paper reviews the existing literature on environmental performance indicators as they relate to private sector organisations, followed by a basic classification of ways in which environmental data are being standardised for use in indicators. It was found that the majority of standardisation schemes for environmental information fall into one of five categories, namely standardised using economic criteria, physical impact categories (such as global warming potential), linear programming methods (such as productive efficiency), economic valuation methods or as part of business management review processes. The paper concludes that environmental data, once normalised, should be used in a diversity of indicators that are tailored to the information needs of the data users and that, as long as normalisation of data is kept separate from aggregation and standardisation, many different indicators can be developed based on a comparatively small dataset.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Cleaner Production |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Pages (from-to) | 453-463 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 0959-6526 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10.2001 |
Bibliographical note
Literaturverz. S. 462 - 463UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Research areas and keywords
- Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
- Aggregation
- EMAS
- Environmental performance
- ISO
- Management indicators
- Productive efficiency
- Standardisation
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Environmental Science(all)
- Strategy and Management
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental Indicators for Business: A Review of the Literature and Standardisation Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver