Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of an internet- and app-based stress intervention compared to online psychoeducation in university students with depressive symptoms: Results of a randomized controlled trial

  • Mathias Harrer*
  • , Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen
  • , Lara Fritsche
  • , Christel Salewski
  • , Anna Carlotta Zarski
  • , Dirk Lehr
  • , Harald Baumeister
  • , Pim Cuijpers
  • , David Daniel Ebert
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

    54 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Depression is highly prevalent among university students. Internet-based interventions have been found to be effective in addressing depressive symptoms, but it is open if this also applies to interventions directed at academic stress. It is also largely unclear if the techniques employed in such programs provide significant additional benefits when controlling for non-specific intervention effects. A sample of N = 200 students with elevated levels of depression (CES-D ≥ 16) of a large distance-learning university were randomly assigned to either an Internet- and App-based stress intervention group (IG; n = 100) or an active control group (CG; n = 100) receiving an Internet-based psychoeducational program of equal length. Self-report data was assessed at baseline, post-treatment (7 weeks) and three-month follow-up. The primary outcome was depression (CES-D) post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included mental health outcomes, modifiable risk factors, and academic outcomes. We found significant between-group effects on depressive symptom severity (d = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.08–0.64), as well as behavioral activation (d = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.30–0.91), perceived stress (d = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.18–0.73), anxiety (d = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.03–0.67) and other secondary outcomes post-treatment. Effects on depression were sustained at three-month follow-up. Response rates for depressive symptoms were significantly higher in the IG (26%) than the CG (14%) at post-test (χ2=4.5, p = 0.04), but not at three-month follow-up (p = 0.454). We also found significant effects on relevant academic outcomes, including work impairment (follow-up; d = 0.36), work output (post-treatment; d = 0.27) and work cutback (follow-up; d = 0.36). The intervention was more effective for depressive symptoms compared to the CG, and so controlling for unspecific intervention effects. This suggests that specific techniques of the intervention may provide significant additional benefits on depressive symptoms. Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Registration (DRKS): DRKS00011800 (https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011800).

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number100374
    JournalInternet Interventions
    Volume24
    Number of pages11
    ISSN2214-7829
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2021

    Bibliographical note

    © 2021 The Authors.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    2. SDG 4 - Quality Education
      SDG 4 Quality Education

    Research areas and keywords

    • App
    • College students
    • Depression
    • Internet intervention
    • Perceived stress
    • Randomized controlled trial
    • Psychology

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Health Informatics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of an internet- and app-based stress intervention compared to online psychoeducation in university students with depressive symptoms: Results of a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this