Abstract
Young researchers of today will shape the field in the future. In light of current debates about social psychology’s research culture, this exploratory survey assessed early-career researchers’ beliefs (N = 88) about the prevalence of questionable research practices (QRPs), potential causes, and open science as a possible solution. While there was relative consensus that outright fraud is an exception, a majority of participants believed that some QRPs are moderately to highly prevalent what they attributed primarily to academic incentive structures. A majority of participants felt that open science is necessary to improve research practice. They indicated to consider some open science recommendations in the future, but they also indicated some reluctance. Limitation and implications of these findings are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Social Psychology |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 365-371 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| ISSN | 1864-9335 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.11.2017 |
Research areas and keywords
- Early-career researcher
- Open science
- Research practices
- Psychology
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Psychology(all)
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Early-Career Researchers’ Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver