Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Early-Career Researchers’ Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Young researchers of today will shape the field in the future. In light of current debates about social psychology’s research culture, this exploratory survey assessed early-career researchers’ beliefs (N = 88) about the prevalence of questionable research practices (QRPs), potential causes, and open science as a possible solution. While there was relative consensus that outright fraud is an exception, a majority of participants believed that some QRPs are moderately to highly prevalent what they attributed primarily to academic incentive structures. A majority of participants felt that open science is necessary to improve research practice. They indicated to consider some open science recommendations in the future, but they also indicated some reluctance. Limitation and implications of these findings are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalSocial Psychology
    Volume48
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)365-371
    Number of pages7
    ISSN1864-9335
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 01.11.2017

    Research areas and keywords

    • Early-career researcher
    • Open science
    • Research practices
    • Psychology

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Psychology(all)
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Early-Career Researchers’ Perceptions of the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Potential Causes, and Open Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this