Do employers have more monopsony power in slack labor markets?

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article confronts monopsony theory’s predictions regarding workers’ wages with observed wage patterns over the business cycle. Using German administrative data for the years 1985 to 2010 and an estimation framework based on duration models, the authors construct a time series of the labor supply elasticity to the firm and estimate its relationship to the unemployment rate. They find that firms possess more monopsony power during economic downturns. Half of this cyclicality stems from workers’ job separations being less wage driven when unemployment rises, and the other half mirrors that firms find it relatively easier to poach workers. Results show that the cyclicality is more pronounced in tight labor markets with low unemployment, and that the findings are robust to controlling for time-invariant unobserved worker or plant heterogeneity. The authors further document that cyclical changes in workers’ entry wages are of similar magnitude as those predicted under pure monopsonistic wage setting.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalIndustrial and Labor Relations Review
    Volume71
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)676-704
    Number of pages29
    ISSN0019-7939
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 01.05.2018

    Research areas and keywords

    • Economics
    • monopsony power
    • business cycle
    • wage cyclicality

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Strategy and Management
    • Management of Technology and Innovation
    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do employers have more monopsony power in slack labor markets?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this