Abstract
This introduction to the special issue on impact investing applies the attractive nuisance notion to impact investing. Social sector actors ‘trespassing’ on the playing field of conventional investment markets may not appreciate the risks. We apply the framework of essentially contested concepts to foster fruitful diverse research in this emerging research field. We advance six dimensions (intentionality, additionality, contribution, materiality, measurability and attribution), which we propose allow to describe different sub-clusters of how the term is used in research and practice. For each dimension we identify risks and opportunities stemming from the contested nature and highlight an ambitious research agenda for how future business ethics scholars can help address and foster impact investing. We conclude by illustrating how the papers in this special issue address these challenges.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Business Ethics |
| Volume | 179 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 937-950 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| ISSN | 0167-4544 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01.09.2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Part of a collection:
Special Issue - Impact Investing - Critical Examinations of Motivations, Processes and Results
Research areas and keywords
- Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics
- Impact investing
- Intentionality
- Measurement
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Economics and Econometrics
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Business and International Management
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Defining and Conceptualizing Impact Investing: Attractive Nuisance or Catalyst?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver