Abstract
In this article, we develop and apply a typology of formal and sub-stantive party responses to the radical right in three arenas: parliament, party competition, and the media. We argue that these provide distinct environ-ments for parties’ scope of action, which is why responses must always be understood in the light of their respective context. Empirically, we focus on the case of the Federal Republic of Germany and illustrate the usefulness of our model by analyzing the responses of the largest conservative and social democratic mainstream parties in the Bundestag (CDU/CSU and SPD) to the Alternative for Germany (AfD) between 2017 and 2022. Although both coali-tion partners have primarily excluded the AfD at the formal and substantive level, we find crucial differences in their response patterns between the arenas and highlight future research perspectives.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | German Politics and Society |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 87-106 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISSN | 1045-0300 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Georgetown University and Berghahn Books. All Rights Reserved.
Research areas and keywords
- AfD
- mainstream parties
- media
- parliament
- party competition
- party responses
- radical right
- Politics
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Cultural Studies
- History
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dealing with Radical Right Parties in Distinct Arenas Party Responses to the Alternative for Germany in Parliament, Party Competition, and the Media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver