Cost-effectiveness of online positive psychology: Randomized controlled trial

  • Linda Bolier*
  • , Cristina Majo
  • , Filip Smit
  • , Gerben J. Westerhof
  • , Merel Haverman
  • , Jan A. Walburg
  • , Heleen Riper
  • , Ernst Bohlmeijer
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As yet, no evidence is available about the cost-effectiveness of positive psychological interventions. When offered via the Internet, these interventions may be particularly cost-effective, because they are highly scalable and do not rely on scant resources such as therapists' time. Alongside a randomized controlled trial of an online positive psychological intervention, a health-economic evaluation was conducted. Mild to moderately depressed adults seeking self-help and recruited in the general population were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 143) and a waitlisted usual care group (n = 141). Improved clinical outcomes were achieved in the intervention group (at least for depression) at higher costs. When outliers (the top 2.5%, n = 5 in intervention group, n = 2 in control group) were removed, cost-effectiveness was increased considerably. For positive psychology, economic evaluations may be a means to nudge policy decision-makers towards placing positive psychological interventions on the health agenda.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalThe Journal of Positive Psychology
    Volume9
    Issue number5
    Pages (from-to)460-471
    Number of pages12
    ISSN1743-9760
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 09.2014

    Research areas and keywords

    • Health sciences
    • cost-effectiveness
    • Depression
    • economic evaluation
    • positive psychology
    • Randomized controlled trial
    • Well-being

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Psychology(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness of online positive psychology: Randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this