Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Connected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers

  • Sebastian Wallot*
  • , Geoff Hollis
  • , Marieke van Rooij
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The process of connected text reading has received very little attention in contemporary cognitive psychology. This lack of attention is in parts due to a research tradition that emphasizes the role of basic lexical constituents, which can be studied in isolated words or sentences. However, this lack of attention is in parts also due to the lack of statistical analysis techniques, which accommodate interdependent time series. In this study, we investigate text reading performance with traditional and nonlinear analysis techniques and show how outcomes from multiple analyses can used to create a more detailed picture of the process of text reading. Specifically, we investigate reading performance of groups of literate adult readers that differ in reading fluency during a self-paced text reading task. Our results indicate that classical metrics of reading (such as word frequency) do not capture text reading very well, and that classical measures of reading fluency (such as average reading time) distinguish relatively poorly between participant groups. Nonlinear analyses of distribution tails and reading time fluctuations provide more fine-grained information about the reading process and reading fluency.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere71914
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume8
Issue number8
Number of pages22
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20.08.2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Research areas and keywords

  • Psychology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Connected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this