Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative Legal Study on Procedural Rules and their Impact on Collective Redress Actions in Europe

  • Peter Rott*
  • , Axel Halfmeier
  • , Wannes Vandenbussche
  • , Laura Bugatti
  • , Jagna Mucha
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paperExpert opinions

Abstract

The Representative Actions Directive requires EU countries to allow qualified organisations to bring collective actions for consumer redress. However, it leaves many important details up to each country, leading to inconsistencies and challenges in areas like compensation for immaterial damage, evidence disclosure, and case financing. This study commissioned by BEUC focuses on how Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Poland have applied the Directive, identifying obstacles and sharing examples of best practices to improve collective redress mechanisms.

The study highlights the need for better methods to quantify immaterial damage, improve evidence sharing, and reduce the burden of proof in collective actions. It also suggests increasing the use of third-party litigation funding to help cover the costs of these cases. Furthermore, the creation of consumer redress funds at the national or EU level could help bridge funding gaps, ensuring that more consumers can pursue justice in collective redress actions.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationBruxelles
PublisherEuropäischer Verbraucherverband
Number of pages151
Publication statusPublished - 19.03.2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Research areas and keywords

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Legal Study on Procedural Rules and their Impact on Collective Redress Actions in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this