Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Characterising and identifying gaps in sustainability assessments of tourism - a review

    Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper highlights the main stages in developing a process of sustainability assessments in tourism (SAT) and applies a systematic literature review of empirical research based on pre-developed assessment categories. The aim is to characterise general approaches to measuring sustainability in tourism and to identify patterns and research gaps within these approaches. Four major assessment methodologies were identified through a hierarchical cluster analysis. Whereas new frameworks and indices explore new conceptual approaches to sustainability assessments, case studies and systems approaches rely on existing indicator work and create new assessment contexts. The literature review confirms the heterogeneity of these assessments, albeit without an overall sector-specific consensus. The results show that stakeholder involvement is not widely implemented in the indicator-selection process, and indicators are not linked to sustainability targets. The findings demonstrate that more effort is needed in relation to contextualising frameworks and assessment approaches, to foster target-oriented decision-making.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number101004
    JournalTourism Management Perspectives
    Volume43
    ISSN2211-9736
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 01.07.2022

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

    Research areas and keywords

    • Sustainability Governance
    • Sustainability sciences, Communication
    • Tourism studies

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Characterising and identifying gaps in sustainability assessments of tourism - a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this