Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Aufhören oder Weiterdenken? Zur Frage des Umgangs mit Carl Schmitt. Eine Debatte mit Jean-François Kervégan

Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Why should we read Carl Schmitt, an authoritarian and at times convinced National Socialist jurist, today? What could we gain and learn from Schmitt’s thought that would be of more than historical interest? And how should his indissolubly ambivalent texts be dealt with, methodologically and theoretically? With this special issue we aim to pursue these questions in a debate with Jean-François Kervégan, whose book “Que faire de Carl Schmitt?”, provides a fruitful starting point for this. Our claim will be, with Kervégan, that thinking with Carl Schmitt today means not so much to engage with his answers, but rather to take up his questions and to bring them beyond the form he gives them, to reopen them in order to enable new approaches to contemporary problems of the state, the law and democracy.
Original languageGerman
JournalRechtsphilosophie: Zeitschrift fuer Grundlagen des Rechts (RphZ)
Volume7
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)115-119
Number of pages5
ISSN2364-1355
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Research areas and keywords

  • Fairy tales
  • Folklore
  • History
  • Social & cultural history
  • Philosophy
  • Politics
  • History

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aufhören oder Weiterdenken? Zur Frage des Umgangs mit Carl Schmitt. Eine Debatte mit Jean-François Kervégan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this