Abstract
Against a background of increased regulatory and stakeholder pressures, we present the first literature review of firm- and country-related determinants of carbon reporting quality (CRQ) and the financial and sustainability consequences of CRQ for firms. Based on legitimacy and stakeholder theories, this structured literature review considers 91 peer-reviewed empirical quantitative (archival) studies. We find that board gender diversity, firm size, and carbon performance are the main drivers of increased CRQ. Furthermore, in line with the business case argument for sustainability, there are indications that CRQ leads to increased financial performance and value relevance. This literature review also stresses the urgent need to rely in the future on valid and more comparable CRQ proxies, based on automated text analyses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 110-148 |
| Number of pages | 39 |
| ISSN | 0931-0983 |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Research areas and keywords
- Management studies
- legitimacy theory
- stakeholder theory
- carbon reporting
- corporate governance
- financial performance
- board composition
- Sustainability Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Archival research on carbon reporting quality. A review of determinants and consequences for firm value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver