Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analyzing different types of moderated method effects in confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesTransfer

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An extension of two confirmatory factor models for multitrait-multimethod measurement designs with structurally different methods to the analysis of latent interaction effects is presented: the nonlinear latent difference (NL-LD) model and the nonlinear correlated trait–correlated method-minus-one (NL-CTC[M – 1]) model. Both models are compared with regard to (a) the psychometric definition of the latent variables, (b) the capabilities of explaining latent method effects, and (c) the analysis of latent interaction effects. Using the latent moderated structural equation approach, we show how moderated method effects can be examined in the NL-CTC(M – 1) model. This fine-grained analysis of method effects is not feasible using the classical NL-LD model. We propose an extended version of the NL-LD model, which recovers the results of the NL-CTC(M – 1) model. The different versions of the nonlinear multimethod models are illustrated using real data from a multirater study. Finally, the advantages and challenges of incorporating latent interaction effects in complex CFA–MTMM models are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Volume25
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)179 - 200
Number of pages22
ISSN1070-5511
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 04.03.2018

Research areas and keywords

  • Psychology
  • CTC(M-1) model
  • latent difference model
  • latent moderation analysis
  • structurally different methods
  • Business psychology
  • Sociology

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analyzing different types of moderated method effects in confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this