Abstract
We investigate whether the perceived ethicalness of police actions changes when police follow an AI-robot’s advice. We assess whether perceived ethicalness of police violence is higher when police follow robot advice to arrest a passer-by, compared to no robot advice to arrest the passer-by. Using neutralization theory, we test how blame-shifting occurs. When police violently arrest an innocent passer-by, the violence is neutralized when the decision was made following the AI-robot. Perceived ethicalness of police violence is higher when the passer-by is a terrorist, and police violence against a passer-by is neutralized through ‘denial of victim’ and ‘denial of injury’.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Public Management Review |
| Jahrgang | 26 |
| Ausgabenummer | 8 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 2355-2379 |
| Seitenumfang | 25 |
| ISSN | 1471-9037 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Erschienen - 07.2024 |
Bibliographische Notiz
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 16 – Frieden, Gerechtigkeit und starke Institutionen
Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter
- Informatik
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Public administration
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Who guards the guards with AI-driven robots? The ethicalness and cognitive neutralization of police violence following AI-robot advice“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver