The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice

Stefan Baumgärtner; Stefanie Glotzbach

doi:10.3197/096327112X13400390126055

The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice

Stefan Baumgärtner
, Stefanie Glotzbach

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › Begutachtung

34 Zitate (Scopus)

176 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The principle of sustainability contains two objectives of justice regarding the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ("intragenerational justice"); (2) justice between people of different generations ("intergenerational justice"). Three hypotheses about their relationship – independency, facilitation and rivalry – are held in the political and scientific sustainability discourse. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis to important political documents and the scientific literature, we reveal six determinants underlying the different hypotheses: quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.

Originalsprache	Englisch
Zeitschrift	Environmental Values
Jahrgang	21
Ausgabenummer	3
Seiten (von - bis)	331-355
Seitenumfang	25
ISSN	0963-2719
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3197/096327112X13400390126055
Publikationsstatus	Erschienen - 08.2012

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

Wirtschaftswissenschaften für Nachhaltigkeit
sustainable development
ecosystem services
intragenerational justice
intergenerational justice
ecological justice
sustainability research
Volkswirtschaftslehre
sustainable development
ecosystem services
intragenerational justice
intergenerational justice
ecological justice
sustainability research

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Philosophie
Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.3197/096327112X13400390126055

EIGEN: Verbundprojekt: Effiziente inter- und intragenerationell gerechte Nutzung von Ökosystemdienstleistungen - EIGEN, Teilprojekt: Ökonomische und philosophische Analyse von Zielkonflikten in der Biodiversitätspolitik
Baumgärtner, S. (Wissenschaftliche Projektleiter*in), Quaas, M. F. (Wissenschaftliche Projektleiter*in), Hoberg, N. (Projektmitarbeiter*in), Stumpf, K. H. (Projektmitarbeiter*in), Voss, R. (Projektmitarbeiter*in), Glotzbach, S. (Projektmitarbeiter*in), Fünfgelt, J. (Projektmitarbeiter*in), Döring, R. (Partner*in), Schmidt, J. (Partner*in) & Becker, C. (Projektmitarbeiter*in)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
01.07.10 → 31.10.13
Projekt: Forschung

Datei
Intergenerationelle Gerechtigkeit und ökonomische Effizienz in der Nutzung von Ökosystemdienstleistungen unter Unsicherheit
Baumgärtner, S. (Wissenschaftliche Projektleiter*in), Glotzbach, S. (Projektmitarbeiter*in), Hoberg, N. (Projektmitarbeiter*in), Fünfgelt, J. (Projektmitarbeiter*in) & Stumpf, K. H. (Projektmitarbeiter*in)
22.07.09 → 31.03.11
Projekt: Forschung

Dieses zitieren

@article{1f9886ae0aec4e929edf688b7f4287f7,

title = "The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice",

abstract = "The principle of sustainability contains two objectives of justice regarding the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ({"}intragenerational justice{"}); (2) justice between people of different generations ({"}intergenerational justice{"}). Three hypotheses about their relationship – independency, facilitation and rivalry – are held in the political and scientific sustainability discourse. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis to important political documents and the scientific literature, we reveal six determinants underlying the different hypotheses: quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.",

keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management \& Economics, sustainable development, ecosystem services, intragenerational justice, intergenerational justice, ecological justice, sustainability research, Ecological justice, Ecosystem services, Intergenerational justice, Intragenerational justice, Sustainability research, Sustainable development, Economics, sustainable development, ecosystem services, intragenerational justice, intergenerational justice, ecological justice, sustainability research",

author = "Stefan Baumg{\"a}rtner and Stefanie Glotzbach",

year = "2012",

month = aug,

doi = "10.3197/096327112X13400390126055",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "331--355",

journal = "Environmental Values",

issn = "0963-2719",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice

AU - Baumgärtner, Stefan

AU - Glotzbach, Stefanie

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - The principle of sustainability contains two objectives of justice regarding the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ("intragenerational justice"); (2) justice between people of different generations ("intergenerational justice"). Three hypotheses about their relationship – independency, facilitation and rivalry – are held in the political and scientific sustainability discourse. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis to important political documents and the scientific literature, we reveal six determinants underlying the different hypotheses: quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.

AB - The principle of sustainability contains two objectives of justice regarding the conservation and use of ecosystems and their services: (1) global justice between different people of the present generation ("intragenerational justice"); (2) justice between people of different generations ("intergenerational justice"). Three hypotheses about their relationship – independency, facilitation and rivalry – are held in the political and scientific sustainability discourse. Applying the method of qualitative content analysis to important political documents and the scientific literature, we reveal six determinants underlying the different hypotheses: quantity and quality of ecosystem services, population development, substitutability of ecosystem services, technological progress, institutions and political restrictions.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - sustainable development

KW - ecosystem services

KW - intragenerational justice

KW - intergenerational justice

KW - ecological justice

KW - sustainability research

KW - Ecological justice

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Intergenerational justice

KW - Intragenerational justice

KW - Sustainability research

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Economics

KW - sustainable development

KW - ecosystem services

KW - intragenerational justice

KW - intergenerational justice

KW - ecological justice

KW - sustainability research

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84863859814

U2 - 10.3197/096327112X13400390126055

DO - 10.3197/096327112X13400390126055

M3 - Journal articles

SN - 0963-2719

VL - 21

SP - 331

EP - 355

JO - Environmental Values

JF - Environmental Values

IS - 3

ER -

The relationship between intragenerational and intergenerational ecological justice

Abstract

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zugriff auf Dokument

Fingerprint

Projekte

EIGEN: Verbundprojekt: Effiziente inter- und intragenerationell gerechte Nutzung von Ökosystemdienstleistungen - EIGEN, Teilprojekt: Ökonomische und philosophische Analyse von Zielkonflikten in der Biodiversitätspolitik

Intergenerationelle Gerechtigkeit und ökonomische Effizienz in der Nutzung von Ökosystemdienstleistungen unter Unsicherheit

Dieses zitieren