Abstract
Key Points
• Although of great practical importance for businesses and their advisors, the treatment of non-controlling and controlling minority shareholdings under the EU competition rules lacks consistency and guidance.
• The authors argue that a more harmonized approach does not require an amendment of the EU Merger Regulation; rather, Art 101 TFEU can and should be applied in appropriate cases.
• The Austrian Supreme Court in the Austrian Drugstore case missed the opportunity to ask the Court of Justice for clarification on the applica-
bility of Art 101 TFEU in relation to a minority shareholder.
• Although of great practical importance for businesses and their advisors, the treatment of non-controlling and controlling minority shareholdings under the EU competition rules lacks consistency and guidance.
• The authors argue that a more harmonized approach does not require an amendment of the EU Merger Regulation; rather, Art 101 TFEU can and should be applied in appropriate cases.
• The Austrian Supreme Court in the Austrian Drugstore case missed the opportunity to ask the Court of Justice for clarification on the applica-
bility of Art 101 TFEU in relation to a minority shareholder.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Journal of European Competition Law and Practice |
| Jahrgang | 12 |
| Ausgabenummer | 8 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 604-616 |
| Seitenumfang | 13 |
| ISSN | 2041-7764 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Erschienen - 01.10.2021 |
Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter
- Rechtswissenschaft
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Recht
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „The competition rules applying to the relationship between a minority shareholder and the joint venture“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver