Abstract
Argument This paper argues that the economics discipline is highly concentrated, which may inhibit scientific innovation and change in the future. The argument is based on an empirical investigation of six dimensions of concentration in economics between 1956 and 2016 using a large-scale data set. The results show that North America accounts for nearly half of all articles and three quarters of all citations. Twenty institutions reap a share of 42 percent of citations, five journals a share of 28.5 percent, and 100 authors a share of 15.5 percent. A total of 2.8 percent of citations may be attributed to heterodox schools of thought. Also top articles are concentrated along these dimensions. Overall, concentration has strongly increased over the last six decades.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Science in Context |
| Jahrgang | 32 |
| Ausgabenummer | 4 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 381-410 |
| Seitenumfang | 30 |
| ISSN | 0269-8897 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Erschienen - 01.12.2019 |
| Extern publiziert | Ja |
Bibliographische Notiz
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press.
Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter
- Volkswirtschaftslehre
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Wissenschaftsgeschichte und -philosophie
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Six Dimensions of Concentration in Economics: Evidence from a Large-Scale Data Set“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver