Reframing the Food–Biodiversity Challenge

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenÜbersichtsarbeitenForschung

169 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the serious limitations of production-oriented frameworks, we offer here a new conceptual framework for how to analyze the nexus of food security and biodiversity conservation. We introduce four archetypes of social-ecological system states corresponding to win–win (e.g., agroecology), win–lose (e.g., intensive agriculture), lose–win (e.g., fortress conservation), and lose–lose (e.g., degraded landscapes) outcomes for food security and biodiversity conservation. Each archetype is shaped by characteristic external drivers, exhibits characteristic internal social-ecological features, and has characteristic feedbacks that maintain it. This framework shifts the emphasis from focusing on production only to considering social-ecological dynamics, and enables comparison among landscapes. Moreover, examining drivers and feedbacks facilitates the analysis of possible transitions between system states (e.g., from a lose–lose outcome to a more preferred outcome).

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Jahrgang32
Ausgabenummer5
Seiten (von - bis)335-345
Seitenumfang11
ISSN0169-5347
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 05.2017

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 2 – Kein Hunger
    SDG 2 – Kein Hunger

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

  • Ökosystemforschung

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Ökologie, Evolution, Verhaltenswissenschaften und Systematik

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Reframing the Food–Biodiversity Challenge“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren