Abstract
The article distinguishes two models of self-realization. The independence model claims that self-realization is compatible with leading a non-moral life, whereas the dependence model argues the converse. Hegel′s influential version of the dependence model aims at showing why and how self-realization must be embedded in a complex structure of reasonable social relations. I argue that Hegel′s dependence model abrogates the „Recht der Besonderheit, sich befriedigt zu finden” and is thus not convincing. What I call Hegel′s “inofficial theory”, however, concedes an infusible conflict between modernity and self-realization; philosophy has to reconcile the individual with the impossibility of being a „ganzer Mensch” in modern societies. After an interlude with Michael Theunissen′s indpendence model, I turn to T. H. Green′s theory of self-realization. Green provides a richer explanatory story than Hegel as to why other-regarding acts contribute to self-realization; however, this story leaves not enough conceptual room for interpersonal conflict and is vulnerable to similar objections to Hegel′s account.
| Titel in Übersetzung | Perfectionism and Pathologies of Self-Realization |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
| Zeitschrift | Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie |
| Jahrgang | 58 |
| Ausgabenummer | 5 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 741-757 |
| Seitenumfang | 17 |
| ISSN | 0012-1045 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Erschienen - 11.2010 |
Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter
- Philosophie
- Hegel
- interpersonal relationsn
- modernity
- perfectionism
- self-realization
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Philosophie
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Perfektionismus und Pathologien der Selbstverwirklichung“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver