Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated

  • Oliver Genschow*
  • , Sofie Van Den Bossche
  • , Emiel Cracco
  • , Lara Bardi
  • , Davide Rigoni
  • , Marcel Brass
  • *Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungBegutachtung

81 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

It is widely known that individuals have a tendency to imitate each other. However, different psychological disciplines assess imitation in different manners. While social psychologists assess mimicry by means of action observation, cognitive psychologists assess automatic imitation with reaction time based measures on a trial-by-trial basis. Although these methods differ in crucial methodological aspects, both phenomena are assumed to rely on similar underlying mechanisms. This raises the fundamental question whether mimicry and automatic imitation are actually correlated. In the present research we assessed both phenomena and did not find a meaningful correlation. Moreover, personality traits such as empathy, autism traits, and traits related to self- versus other-focus did not correlate with mimicry or automatic imitation either. Theoretical implications are discussed.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere0183784
ZeitschriftPLoS ONE
Jahrgang12
Ausgabenummer9
Seitenumfang21
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 06.09.2017
Extern publiziertJa

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Genschow et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

  • Wirtschaftspsychologie

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Allgemein

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren