Abstract
Educational research assumes reflection on teaching examples to have positive effects on pre-service teachers' professional development. The role of teaching quality in such examples is unclear, however. In a field experiment with a pre-post-design, we taught “planning self-controlled learning” to 83 undergraduate pre-service physical education teachers and assigned them to three conditions: they either reflected on good teaching or problematic teaching examples or they compared both types of examples. We found that the comparison of examples supported their instruction planning more than reflecting good or problematic teaching examples only. In addition, comparing examples changed the pre-service teachers' beliefs.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Teaching and Teacher Education |
| Jahrgang | 71 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 168-178 |
| Seitenumfang | 11 |
| ISSN | 0742-051X |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Erschienen - 04.2018 |
| Extern publiziert | Ja |
Bibliographische Notiz
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 4 – Qualitativ hochwertige Bildung
Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter
- Erziehungswissenschaften
- Psychologie
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Ausbildung bzw. Denomination
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Learning to plan self-controlled physical education: Good vs. problematic teaching examples“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver