Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Learning to plan self-controlled physical education: Good vs. problematic teaching examples

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Zeitschriftenaufsätze › Forschung › Begutachtung

15 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Educational research assumes reflection on teaching examples to have positive effects on pre-service teachers' professional development. The role of teaching quality in such examples is unclear, however. In a field experiment with a pre-post-design, we taught “planning self-controlled learning” to 83 undergraduate pre-service physical education teachers and assigned them to three conditions: they either reflected on good teaching or problematic teaching examples or they compared both types of examples. We found that the comparison of examples supported their instruction planning more than reflecting good or problematic teaching examples only. In addition, comparing examples changed the pre-service teachers' beliefs.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftTeaching and Teacher Education
Jahrgang71
Seiten (von - bis)168-178
Seitenumfang11
ISSN0742-051X
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 04.2018
Extern publiziertJa

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 4 – Qualitativ hochwertige Bildung
    SDG 4 – Qualitativ hochwertige Bildung

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

  • Erziehungswissenschaften
  • Psychologie

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Ausbildung bzw. Denomination

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Learning to plan self-controlled physical education: Good vs. problematic teaching examples“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren