Abstract
After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU’s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
|---|---|
| Titel | European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016 |
| Redakteure/-innen | Marc Bungenberg, Christoph Herrmann, Markus Krajewski, Jörg Philipp Terhechte |
| Seitenumfang | 4 |
| Erscheinungsort | Cham |
| Herausgeber (Verlag) | Springer Nature Switzerland AG |
| Erscheinungsdatum | 2016 |
| Seiten | 831-834 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-319-29214-4 |
| ISBN (elektronisch) | 978-3-319-29215-1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Erschienen - 2016 |
| Extern publiziert | Ja |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 16 – Frieden, Gerechtigkeit und starke Institutionen
Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter
- Rechtswissenschaft
Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver