Correction to: Scenario modeling of ammonia emissions from surface applied urea under temperate conditions: application effects and model comparison (Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, (2018), 110, 1, (177-193), 10.1007/s10705-017-9883-5)

The captions of figures 3–6 in the original publication are misplaced. The correct figure captions are as follows.Fig. 3: Linear regression of simulated relative ammonia emissions by the dynamic model Volt Air on measured relative ammonia emissions for the parameterization data set (three sites), modelling performance indicators: axis intercept and slope, coefficient of determination (R2), d-index (d), modelling efficiency (ME), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean bias error (MBE).Fig. 4: Linear regression of simulated relative ammonia emissions by the dynamic model Volt’Air on measured relative ammonia emissions for the validation data set (three sites), modelling performance indicators: axis intercept and slope, coefficient of determination (R2), d-index (d), modelling efficiency (ME), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean bias error (MBE). Fig. 5: Linear regression of simulated relative ammonia emissions by the statistical model on measured relative ammonia emissions for the parameterisation data set (three sites), modelling performance indicators: axis intercept and slope, coefficient of determination (R2), d-index (d), modelling efficiency (ME), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean bias error (MBE). Fig. 6: Linear regression of simulated relative ammonia emissions by the statistical model on measured relative ammonia emissions for the validation data set (three sites), modelling performance indicators: axis intercept and slope, coefficient of determination (R2),d-index (d), modelling efficiency (ME), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean bias error (MBE). The original article was corrected.