Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus (CODIAC) 2021: User involvement in diabetes care, prevention and research

  • Paul Bloch*
  • , Kevin Dadaczynski
  • , Dan Grabowski
  • , Kirsten Lomborg
  • , Kasper Olesen
  • , Lauge Neimann Rasmussen
  • , Peter Rossing
  • , Annemarie Varming
  • , Ingrid Willaing
  • , Janet Harris
  • , Richard I.G. Holt
  • , Bjarne Bruun Jensen
  • *Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

    Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungBegutachtung

    1 Zitat (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aims: User involvement is pivotal for health development, but there are significant gaps in our understanding of the concept. The Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus on User Involvement in Diabetes Care, Prevention and Research (CODIAC) was established to address these gaps, share knowledge and develop best practices. Methods: A literature review of user involvement was undertaken in diabetes care, prevention and research. Moreover, a Group Concept Mapping (GCM) survey synthesized the knowledge and opinions of researchers, healthcare professionals and people with diabetes and their carers to identify gaps between what is important for user involvement and what is being done in practice. Finally, a consensus conference discussed the main gaps in knowledge and practice while developing plans to address the shortcomings. Results: The literature review demonstrated that user involvement is an effective strategy for diabetes care, prevention and research, given the right support and conditions, but gaps and key challenges regarding the value and impact of user involvement approaches were found. The GCM process identified 11 major gaps, where important issues were not being sufficiently practised. The conference considered these gaps and opportunities to develop new collaborative initiatives under eight overall themes. Conclusions: User involvement is effective and adds value to diabetes care, prevention and research when used under the right circumstances. CODIAC developed new learning about the way in which academic and research knowledge can be transferred to more practice-oriented knowledge and concrete collaborative initiatives. This approach may be a potential new framework for initiatives in which coherence of process can lead to coherent outputs.

    OriginalspracheEnglisch
    Aufsatznummere15160
    ZeitschriftDiabetic Medicine
    Jahrgang41
    Ausgabenummer1
    Seitenumfang10
    ISSN0742-3071
    DOIs
    PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.2024

    Bibliographische Notiz

    Funding Information:
    We would like to express our thanks to the many citizens with and without diabetes, as well as clinicians, researchers and other professionals, who shared their experiences and perspectives on user involvement as part of the Group Concept Mapping survey and at the CODIAC conference. Also, thanks to the Novo Nordisk Foundation for providing financial support to the CODIAC conference and thus for making this study possible.

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2023 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.

    UN SDGs

    Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

    1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
      SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

    Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

    • Psychologie

    ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

    • Endokrinologie
    • Endokrinologie, Diabetes und Stoffwechsel
    • Innere Medizin

    Fingerprint

    Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus (CODIAC) 2021: User involvement in diabetes care, prevention and research“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

    Dieses zitieren