Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology

Tina Heger; Anna T. Pahl; Zoltan Botta-Dukát; Francesca Gherardi; Christina Hoppe; Ivan Hoste; Kurt Jax; Leena Lindström; Pieter Boets; Sylvia Haider; Johannes Kollmann; Meike J. Wittmann; Jonathan M. Jeschke

doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x

Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology

Tina Heger^*
, Anna T. Pahl
, Zoltan Botta-Dukát
, Francesca Gherardi
, Christina Hoppe
, Ivan Hoste
, Kurt Jax
, Leena Lindström
, Pieter Boets
, Sylvia Haider
, Johannes Kollmann
, Meike J. Wittmann
, Jonathan M. Jeschke

^*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung

62 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Invasion ecology has much advanced since its early beginnings. Nevertheless, explanation, prediction, and management of biological invasions remain difficult. We argue that progress in invasion research can be accelerated by, first, pointing out difficulties this field is currently facing and, second, looking for measures to overcome them. We see basic and applied research in invasion ecology confronted with difficulties arising from (A) societal issues, e.g., disparate perceptions of invasive species; (B) the peculiarity of the invasion process, e.g., its complexity and context dependency; and (C) the scientific methodology, e.g., imprecise hypotheses. To overcome these difficulties, we propose three key measures: (1) a checklist for definitions to encourage explicit definitions; (2) implementation of a hierarchy of hypotheses (HoH), where general hypotheses branch into specific and precisely testable hypotheses; and (3) platforms for improved communication. These measures may significantly increase conceptual clarity and enhance communication, thus advancing invasion ecology.

Originalsprache	Englisch
Zeitschrift	Ambio
Jahrgang	42
Ausgabenummer	5
Seiten (von - bis)	527-540
Seitenumfang	14
ISSN	0044-7447
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x
Publikationsstatus	Erschienen - 27.03.2013
Extern publiziert	Ja

Bibliographische Notiz

Funding Information:
This paper summarizes the results of many fruitful discussions during the workshop “Tackling the emerging crisis of invasion biology: How can ecological theory, experiments, and field studies be combined to achieve major progress?” (March 2010 in Benediktbeuern, Germany; workshop of the specialist group “Theory in Ecology” of the Ecological Society of Germany, Austria and Switzerland, GfÖ), organized by TH, SH, ATP, and JMJ. We thank Laura Aquiloni, Silvia Bertocchi, Sara Brusconi, Alberto Inghilesi, Christiane Koch, Giuseppe Mazza, Roberto Merciai, Gabriele Orioli, and Elena Tricarico for their valuable contributions during this workshop. Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz as well as anonymous reviewers provided many critical comments that helped to improve the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed through Peerage of Science ( http://www.peerageofscience.org ). Stella Copeland provided language corrections. JMJ acknowledges financial support from the DFG (JE 288/4-1).

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

Biologie
Communication platforms
Hierarchy of hypotheses
Invasive alien species
Synthesis
Transdisciplinarity

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ökologie
Geografie, Planung und Entwicklung
Umweltchemie

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x

Dieses zitieren

@article{71fdb08cddd14360bbd67e721145a47e,

title = "Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology",

abstract = "Invasion ecology has much advanced since its early beginnings. Nevertheless, explanation, prediction, and management of biological invasions remain difficult. We argue that progress in invasion research can be accelerated by, first, pointing out difficulties this field is currently facing and, second, looking for measures to overcome them. We see basic and applied research in invasion ecology confronted with difficulties arising from (A) societal issues, e.g., disparate perceptions of invasive species; (B) the peculiarity of the invasion process, e.g., its complexity and context dependency; and (C) the scientific methodology, e.g., imprecise hypotheses. To overcome these difficulties, we propose three key measures: (1) a checklist for definitions to encourage explicit definitions; (2) implementation of a hierarchy of hypotheses (HoH), where general hypotheses branch into specific and precisely testable hypotheses; and (3) platforms for improved communication. These measures may significantly increase conceptual clarity and enhance communication, thus advancing invasion ecology.",

keywords = "Biology, Communication platforms, Hierarchy of hypotheses, Invasive alien species, Synthesis, Transdisciplinarity",

author = "Tina Heger and Pahl, \{Anna T.\} and Zoltan Botta-Duk{\'a}t and Francesca Gherardi and Christina Hoppe and Ivan Hoste and Kurt Jax and Leena Lindstr{\"o}m and Pieter Boets and Sylvia Haider and Johannes Kollmann and Wittmann, \{Meike J.\} and Jeschke, \{Jonathan M.\}",

note = "Funding Information: This paper summarizes the results of many fruitful discussions during the workshop “Tackling the emerging crisis of invasion biology: How can ecological theory, experiments, and field studies be combined to achieve major progress?” (March 2010 in Benediktbeuern, Germany; workshop of the specialist group “Theory in Ecology” of the Ecological Society of Germany, Austria and Switzerland, Gf{\"O}), organized by TH, SH, ATP, and JMJ. We thank Laura Aquiloni, Silvia Bertocchi, Sara Brusconi, Alberto Inghilesi, Christiane Koch, Giuseppe Mazza, Roberto Merciai, Gabriele Orioli, and Elena Tricarico for their valuable contributions during this workshop. Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz as well as anonymous reviewers provided many critical comments that helped to improve the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed through Peerage of Science ( http://www.peerageofscience.org ). Stella Copeland provided language corrections. JMJ acknowledges financial support from the DFG (JE 288/4-1).",

year = "2013",

month = mar,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x",

language = "English",

volume = "42",

pages = "527--540",

journal = "Ambio",

issn = "0044-7447",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology

AU - Heger, Tina

AU - Pahl, Anna T.

AU - Botta-Dukát, Zoltan

AU - Gherardi, Francesca

AU - Hoppe, Christina

AU - Hoste, Ivan

AU - Jax, Kurt

AU - Lindström, Leena

AU - Boets, Pieter

AU - Haider, Sylvia

AU - Kollmann, Johannes

AU - Wittmann, Meike J.

AU - Jeschke, Jonathan M.

N1 - Funding Information: This paper summarizes the results of many fruitful discussions during the workshop “Tackling the emerging crisis of invasion biology: How can ecological theory, experiments, and field studies be combined to achieve major progress?” (March 2010 in Benediktbeuern, Germany; workshop of the specialist group “Theory in Ecology” of the Ecological Society of Germany, Austria and Switzerland, GfÖ), organized by TH, SH, ATP, and JMJ. We thank Laura Aquiloni, Silvia Bertocchi, Sara Brusconi, Alberto Inghilesi, Christiane Koch, Giuseppe Mazza, Roberto Merciai, Gabriele Orioli, and Elena Tricarico for their valuable contributions during this workshop. Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz as well as anonymous reviewers provided many critical comments that helped to improve the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed through Peerage of Science ( http://www.peerageofscience.org ). Stella Copeland provided language corrections. JMJ acknowledges financial support from the DFG (JE 288/4-1).

PY - 2013/3/27

Y1 - 2013/3/27

N2 - Invasion ecology has much advanced since its early beginnings. Nevertheless, explanation, prediction, and management of biological invasions remain difficult. We argue that progress in invasion research can be accelerated by, first, pointing out difficulties this field is currently facing and, second, looking for measures to overcome them. We see basic and applied research in invasion ecology confronted with difficulties arising from (A) societal issues, e.g., disparate perceptions of invasive species; (B) the peculiarity of the invasion process, e.g., its complexity and context dependency; and (C) the scientific methodology, e.g., imprecise hypotheses. To overcome these difficulties, we propose three key measures: (1) a checklist for definitions to encourage explicit definitions; (2) implementation of a hierarchy of hypotheses (HoH), where general hypotheses branch into specific and precisely testable hypotheses; and (3) platforms for improved communication. These measures may significantly increase conceptual clarity and enhance communication, thus advancing invasion ecology.

AB - Invasion ecology has much advanced since its early beginnings. Nevertheless, explanation, prediction, and management of biological invasions remain difficult. We argue that progress in invasion research can be accelerated by, first, pointing out difficulties this field is currently facing and, second, looking for measures to overcome them. We see basic and applied research in invasion ecology confronted with difficulties arising from (A) societal issues, e.g., disparate perceptions of invasive species; (B) the peculiarity of the invasion process, e.g., its complexity and context dependency; and (C) the scientific methodology, e.g., imprecise hypotheses. To overcome these difficulties, we propose three key measures: (1) a checklist for definitions to encourage explicit definitions; (2) implementation of a hierarchy of hypotheses (HoH), where general hypotheses branch into specific and precisely testable hypotheses; and (3) platforms for improved communication. These measures may significantly increase conceptual clarity and enhance communication, thus advancing invasion ecology.

KW - Biology

KW - Communication platforms

KW - Hierarchy of hypotheses

KW - Invasive alien species

KW - Synthesis

KW - Transdisciplinarity

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84883792846

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/959d49cb-97bb-395e-91a5-c81cfca7a0a2/

U2 - 10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x

DO - 10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x

M3 - Scientific review articles

C2 - 23532717

AN - SCOPUS:84883792846

SN - 0044-7447

VL - 42

SP - 527

EP - 540

JO - Ambio

JF - Ambio

IS - 5

ER -

Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology

Abstract

Bibliographische Notiz

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zugriff auf Dokument

Fingerprint

Dieses zitieren