Can measurement errors explain variance in the relationship between muscle- and tendon stiffness and range of motion?—a blinded reliability and objectivity study

  • Konstantin Warneke*
  • , Julia Meder
  • , Gerit Plöschberger
  • , Manuel Oraže
  • , Maximilian Zechner
  • , Daniel Jochum
  • , Stanislav D. Siegel
  • , Andreas Konrad
  • *Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungBegutachtung

2 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The relationship between range of motion (ROM) and underlying parameters such as stiffness (ST) remains controversial throughout the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the potential role of accumulated measurement errors and subjective influences through a comprehensive assessment of both systematic and random errors on the correlation between tissue ST and ROM. Methods: A total of 75 subjects participated in this double-blinded reliability evaluation. Besides muscle thickness assessments, lower legs’ ST in the calf muscle and Achilles tendon (shear-wave elastography [SWE] and viscoelastic parameters [MyotonPRO], respectively) were correlated with ankle dorsiflexion ROM (knee-to-wall test [KtW]). Results: Ultrasound image acquisition (i.e., muscle thickness and ST) and myotonometry showed intrasession reliability (ICC = 0.93–0.99 and 0.72–0.99, respectively) depending on the device. Only for MyotonPRO, there were meaningful systematic and random errors only for decrement (SEM = 0.002–10.629; MAE = 0.01–24.84). ROM showed ICC > 0.99, while for all parameters interday reliability declined (ICC = 0.395–0.88). Interrater objectivity showed ICC = 0.61–0.91 for ultrasound analysis and 0.66–0.96 for myotonometry. No agreement (ICC = 0–0.09) between different ST measurements was observed, while relationship between ST and ROM depended on the investigator (r = 0.21–0.26 versus r = − 0.02–−0.07). Discussion: While aligned with reliability and objectivity metrics from the literature, our results demonstrate that ST determination is device-dependent, and its relationship with ROM varies by measurement day and investigator. This underlines clinically relevant measurement errors in ST evaluation, calling for advance standardization to improve reliability and objectivity, while measurement errors quantified beyond the ICC must not be neglected in future studies.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Jahrgang125
Ausgabenummer9
Seiten (von - bis)2415-2430
Seitenumfang16
ISSN1439-6319
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 09.2025

Bibliographische Notiz

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

  • Sportwissenschaften

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Orthopädie und Sportmedizin
  • Öffentliche Gesundheit, Umwelt- und Arbeitsmedizin
  • Physiologie (medizinische)

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Can measurement errors explain variance in the relationship between muscle- and tendon stiffness and range of motion?—a blinded reliability and objectivity study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren