Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis

  • Wouter Van Ballegooijen
  • , Pim Cuijpers
  • , Annemieke Van Straten
  • , Eirini Karyotaki
  • , Gerhard Andersson
  • , Jan H. Smit
  • , Heleen Riper

    Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungBegutachtung

    331 Zitate (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) is an effective and acceptable treatment for depression, especially when it includes guidance, but its treatment adherence has not yet been systematically studied. We conducted a meta-analysis, comparing the adherence to guided iCBT with the adherence to individual face-to-face CBT. Methods: Studies were selected from a database of trials that investigate treatment for adult depression (see www.evidencebasedpsychotherapies.org), updated to January 2013. We identified 24 studies describing 26 treatment conditions (14 face-to-face CBT, 12 guided iCBT), by means of these inclusion criteria: targeting depressed adults, no comorbid somatic disorder or substance abuse, community recruitment, published in the year 2000 or later. The main outcome measure was the percentage of completed sessions. We also coded the percentage of treatment completers (separately coding for 100% or at least 80% of treatment completed). Results: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial that met our inclusion criteria. Face-to-face CBT treatments ranged from 12 to 28 sessions, guided iCBT interventions consisted of 5 to 9 sessions. Participants in face-to-face CBT completed on average 83.9% of their treatment, which did not differ significantly from participants in guided iCBT (80.8%, P = .59). The percentage of completers (total intervention) was significantly higher in face-to-face CBT (84.7%) than in guided iCBT (65.1%, P < .001), as was the percentage of completers of 80% or more of the intervention (face-to-face CBT: 85.2%, guided iCBT: 67.5%, P = .003). Non-completers of face-to-face CBT completed on average 24.5% of their treatment, while non-completers of guided iCBT completed on average 42.1% of their treatment. Conclusion: We did not find studies that compared guided iCBT and face-to-face CBT in a single trial. Adherence to guided iCBT appears to be adequate and could be equal to adherence to face-to-face CBT.

    OriginalspracheEnglisch
    Aufsatznummere100674
    ZeitschriftPLoS ONE
    Jahrgang9
    Ausgabenummer7
    Seitenumfang11
    ISSN1932-6203
    DOIs
    PublikationsstatusErschienen - 16.07.2014

    UN SDGs

    Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

    1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
      SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

    Fachgebiete und Schlagwörter

    • Gesundheitswissenschaften
    • cognitive therapy
    • depression
    • cognitive behavioural therapy
    • self help

    ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

    • Allgemein

    Fingerprint

    Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Adherence to internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A meta-analysis“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

    Dieses zitieren